What gets quite complicated are the relationships between oil wealth and the health of a country’s economy more generally, which requires one to sort through several theories that are not obviously complementary. On the one hand, wealthier countries tend to be more democratic. On the other, it is not clear that the discovery of natural resources actually produces more wealth (one well-known theory, the so-called resource curse, holds to the contrary).Any of this sound familiar?
But, also, Dr. Ross has hypothesized that the mechanism by which authoritarian regimes perpetuate themselves in oil-rich states is through what he calls the “rentier effect“: popular dissent is quelled through low taxes and lavish government spending. Countries like Qatar and the United Arab Emirates — authoritarian and oil-rich regimes where most citizens nevertheless enjoy a high standard of living — are generally thought to be more stable than others that provide fewer services for their citizens.
"We can't allow things that are inaccurate to stand." — The Word of Our Dan, February 19, 2008.
Saturday, February 05, 2011
Petrarchy
Via Nate Silver:
" generally thought to be more stable than others that provide fewer services for their citizens".
ReplyDeleteThis province certainly suffers under that "DELUSION" .