labradore

"We can't allow things that are inaccurate to stand." — The Word of Our Dan, February 19, 2008.

Friday, May 28, 2010

Pease in a pod (XVI)

Strict constructionists will note the absence here of a question mark, but Mr. Baird rose to respond all the same. ”Mr. Speaker,” he moaned, “the leader of the Liberal Party never misses an occasion to run down Canada.”

“Ohh!” the Liberals moaned back.

“You’re not Canada!” contended one opposition voice.
- Question Period in the House of Commons, May 27, 2010


PREMIER WILLIAMS: I can tell the Leader of the Opposition that I am not the one who quotes in the House of Commons. He refers to comments that are made by the Leader of Opposition when he supports positions that are anti-Newfoundland and Labrador. As a matter of fact, I heard him quote you in the House of Commons just over a month ago. So, it would be nice if you were on our side. That would certainly help, for starters.

- Question Period in the Bow-Wow Parliament, May 17, 2007


PREMIER WILLIAMS: Mr. Speaker, the level of betrayal of the hon. member opposite to the people of Newfoundland and Labrador never ceases to astound me.

She is asking today that we release the legal opinions that could possibly be used, if an action is commenced by CF(L)Co, and give them to Hydro-Quebec so that they can prepare their case against Newfoundland and Labrador and the people of Newfoundland and Labrador. Absolutely not!

- Question Period in the Bow-Wow Parliament, December 1, 2009



MS JOHNSON: Mr. Speaker, I have explained this several times over and over, and somebody said to me on the weekend, they wonder who the Leader of the Opposition works for: Is it the Quebec government or is it Abitibi? They could not figure it out.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Oh, oh!

MS JOHNSON: Her question certainly speaks to why that person asked me that.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Leader of the Opposition.

MS JONES: It is typical of the government opposite, questioning your patriotism in this Province, Mr. Speaker. How dare you speak against us? How dare you challenge us? Well, Mr. Speaker, if the Minister of Environment was doing her job no one in this Province would have to ask her a question.

- Question Period in the Bow-Wow Parliament, May 4, 2010

Labels: ,

Tuesday, May 25, 2010

The traitor in the cabinet

A bit over a year ago, one Mark Griffin, B. Eng. LL.B. dared to ask some heretical questions in public:

I ask you now as I did then, what will become of the power generated from the Exploits River watershed? To be more specific, I am inquiring if the power will ever be subject to a regional recall so if at any time in the future there is the prospect of industrial development in Grand Falls-Windsor or the Exploits Valley would low cost power be available to any potential developer to be used as a competitive edge for the benefit of the region.

In short, is the government prepared to apply the same principle of adjacency to those hydro resources as it regularly promotes in the fishery?
The two heresies, of course, were suggesting that the Exploits power be used for industrial development, and, in particular, that any such use be used in a way that gave central Newfoundland some kind of priority.

In response to such treachery, The Provincial Williams Government made it very clear it would brook no ThoughtCrimes:


"Some people in the region have been calling for the creation of a community trust fund, but government will not and cannot approach economic development in the province in this fashion," said Minister Skinner. "While we continue to work with the Community Development Committee – a dedicated 15-person team consisting of local community, business, and union leaders – to revitalize the central region, we are equally committed to the economic and social development of all areas and regions of the province. Our policies must balance regional requirements."

The Provincial Government has a number of economic development programs available to all regions of the province. In the central region, the Provincial Government has taken unprecedented measures, including the repatriation of hydro and fibre assets and making close to $100 million in new investments in the region.

"We have committed to using the repatriated assets to attract industrial development in the area as part of our approach to strengthen and diversify the region’s economy," said Minister Skinner. "We are providing financial benefits to displaced workers and certain entitlements under the Work Force Reduction Program and Supplementary Retirement Allowance. Available power from the repatriated resources puts us in a stronger position to attract industrial opportunities for the region. However, as with any investment, the collective impact on the province as a whole must be measured as these resources are provincially owned."

Today in the Bow-Wow Parliament, NDP leader Lorraine Michael asked some more heretical questions, and – shockingly – got heretical answers from the Dippity Premier herself:

MS MICHAEL: Mr. Speaker, the Premier knows that hydro from the Abitibi assets cannot currently be incorporated into the provincial power grid because of technical issues. This means that Newfoundland and Labrador Hydro cannot gain access to the power unless huge investments are made to upgrade the grid. The Minister of Natural Resources is on record saying that she is waiting for another major business to arrive in Central Newfoundland that can use the power; that was her hope.
Mr. Speaker, how long are we to wait? Five, ten, twenty years? I ask the Premier: How long are we going to have to wait before these assets are turned into real benefits, instead of pinning everything on phantom hopes?

MS DUNDERDALE: Mr. Speaker, as Abitibi went through its crisis, struggling and stumbling on its way to bankruptcy where it finds itself today, the overwhelming plea we heard from the people of Central Newfoundland in particular was: Please, do not let them go with our natural resources.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MS DUNDERDALE: Give us, give our children, give our grandchildren, the opportunity to earn their livings once again from the land and from our hydro assets.
Mr. Speaker, we are not writing off Central Newfoundland. We may not have an industrial customer at the moment looking for that power, but that day will come, Mr. Speaker. When that day does come, we will have the assets to do something with, to drive economic development in that part of the Province, Mr. Speaker, once again.

Alrighty, then. We want an industrial customer for the power, and We want it to drive economic development in Central Newfoundland where the power is produced.

Two of the very same things that Mark Griffin, open and notorious traitor, proposed back in early 2009.

Isn’t it really unfortunate when one of our own comes out and betrays us like that?

Labels:

Wednesday, May 05, 2010

Paranoia (IV)

The Prequel, in which the Master Scoundrel himself finds a refuge. November 30th, 2009:

PREMIER WILLIAMS: First of all, Mr. Speaker, I cannot understand why the Opposition is so cozy with Quebec. I cannot understand why they are so concerned about Quebec interests. I cannot understand why they want us to do business with Quebec, the way that Quebec shafted them. Maybe it is just a little bit of guilt to the fact that it was a Liberal government –

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Oh, oh!

PREMIER WILLIAMS: – that gave this away some forty or fifty years ago. Maybe it is just a little guilt and a little shame that back in 2003, when she was a member of the Cabinet, Premier Grimes and his government were going to have the second largest giveaway in the entire Province. Maybe that is what motivates her.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

PREMIER WILLIAMS: The simple answer to her question is I am not prepared, on behalf of this government, to authorize spending $10 million a year on nothing for seven years.
And December 1, 2009:
MS JONES: Mr. Speaker, yesterday, the Premier stated that the Department of Justice has completed a review on the Upper Churchill deal and had received some legal opinions from Quebec lawyers. These legal opinions have since been forwarded to CF(L)Co, as we know, and they have asked Hydro-Quebec to have discussions around renegotiating the deal.

I ask the Premier today if he is prepared to table those legal opinions so that they are available to the public.

PREMIER WILLIAMS: Mr. Speaker, the level of betrayal of the hon. member opposite to the people of Newfoundland and Labrador never ceases to astound me.

She is asking today that we release the legal opinions that could possibly be used, if an action is commenced by CF(L)Co, and give them to Hydro-Quebec so that they can prepare their case against Newfoundland and Labrador and the people of Newfoundland and Labrador. Absolutely not!

[...]

PREMIER WILLIAMS: There is something, obviously, the Leader of the Opposition is missing here because I cannot understand why she is trying to accommodate Quebec in this whole exercise.

Labels: ,

Tuesday, May 04, 2010

Paranoia (I)

From the dismal proceedings of the Bow-Wow Parliament, a scoundrel finds her last refuge:

MS JONES: The minister says she provided us with a copy, she invited us to come and view documents in her office which we have started to do this morning I would say to the minister. She knows we are going to continue to do that until Friday. My question to the minister is this, Mr. Speaker, why are they not costing the inventory? They say they do not trust Abitibi yet they are putting all of their trust in Abitibi in providing them with the cost of remediation on this project. Minister, why are you not providing those numbers yourself?

MS JOHNSON: Mr. Speaker, I have explained this several times over and over and somebody said to me on the weekend, they wonder who the Leader of the Opposition works for is it the Quebec government or is it Abitibi, they could not figure it out.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Oh, oh!

MS JOHNSON: Her question certainly speaks to why that person asked me that.
I have explained time and time again that is why we issued the orders, to get the next phase of the environmental site assessment done, which is phase three. It looks at risk assessment. It is up to Abitibi to submit a remediation plan to us. We sign off on that remediation plan and only then will the cost be known because the cost is a responsibility of Abitibi that is why we are taking it through the court process, Mr. Speaker.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

Labels: