labradore

"We can't allow things that are inaccurate to stand." — The Word of Our Dan, February 19, 2008.

Thursday, May 13, 2010

Quite a bit of misunderstanding

Four years ago, in the middle of CNLOPB Crisis 2006, Dear Leader described the importance of the Board’s top job as follows:
Mr. Speaker, we want to make sure that we have a person at the head of the CNLOPB who is going to represent the interests of the people of Newfoundland and Labrador and be a champion of that cause of no more giveaways.
A little later, Craig Jackson reported for the Telegram, on August 16:
The Telegram, meanwhile, asked the premier if he still believes Ruelokke is a friend of the oil companies and isn't best suited for the CNLOPB job.

"The one thing I don't want to do is disparage the character of Mr. Ruelokke," he said. "That's not what this is about. He's a competent individual in his own right, who is good at what he does."

But, Williams said, the CEO and chairman of the CNLOPB is an extremely important position. The organization is the regulator of the offshore oil and gas industry, he said.
It's important the person heading the CNLOPB be someone who believes "we can't give away the resources of this province, that we need to get maximum benefits for the people of this province, that we can't let big oil come in here and just completely strip us of all the benefits," Williams said.
Never mind, of course, that it is not actually the job of the CNLOPB to represent the interests of the province in negotiating benefits with offshore oil and gas companies.

That job, legally and politically, belongs to the provincial government. Or, if you prefer, the Provincial Government. The Provincial Government has jurisdiction over Giveaways and the Prevention of Giveaways.

Which is exactly what Natural Resources Minister Kathy Blunderdale Dunderdale told the House on Wednesday:
MS DUNDERDALE: Mr. Speaker, there seems to be quite a bit of misunderstanding about the role of the C-NLOPB.

Mr. Speaker, the C-NLOPB is the chief regulator here in this Province, and we have had discussion with regard to whether or not certain responsibilities should be stripped away from the C-NLOPB because it has been described as economic benefits, royalties being set, that all of these responsibilities lie with the board. Mr. Speaker, none of those responsibilities lie with the board. None of them. The C-NLOPB is the regulator, and what we see happening in the rest of the world is they are moving their boards to where our board already is. They are separating royalties, economic benefits from the regulation, safety and environment, Mr. Speaker.
And that is enough to make a body’s head spin: Minister Dunderdale has, and has expressed in words, a better, fuller, and more accurate understanding of the regulatory framework around offshore development, than the Great Negotiator, Great Lawyer, and Rhodes Scholar Himself.

Labels:

2 Comments:

At 2:08 PM, May 13, 2010 , Blogger Jerry Bannister said...

Hang onto your hat, because this afternoon VOCM is offering another head-spinning moment that's worth quoting in full for posterity:

"It's a tale of two news releases, and it depends which side you are on, whether or not a decision by the Regie de L'Engergie in Quebec is denying fair access to Hydro-Quebec's transmission grid. Yesteday, Nalcor Energy issued a news release titled, "Fair Access to Quebec's Transmission System is Denied". Hydro-Quebec issued its own news release titled, "Fair Access to Quebec's Transmission System is Confirmed". Which is it?

Well, it clearly depends on which side of the argument you're on. Nalcor Energy says the Regie ruled soley in favour of Hydro-Quebec and dismissed all legitimate arguments presented by Nalcor. CEO Ed Martin says the province was willing to pay its fair share of rental fees and system upgrades to transport electricity from the Lower Churchill to markets through Quebec. Hydro-Quebec says Newfoundland and Labrador Hydro was never denied fair and open access to their transmission grid, however it must be willing to pay its share of the transmission costs and facilities upgrades. Hydro-Quebec says the Regie also confirmed that Newfoundland and Labrador Hydro had not adhered completely to the provisions of the Open Access Transmission Tariff in requesting transmission service from Hydro-Quebec. Nalcor counters that the Regie refused to suspend the timelines association with their request while the company was following formal complaint procedures, resulting in a termination of Nalcor's application."

When was the last time you read or heard a VOCM story that gave equal coverage to two opposing views of an issue, let alone a story involving Churchill Falls and Quebec?

Strange days indeed.

 
At 6:51 PM, May 13, 2010 , Blogger Blech said...

The whole Rhodes Scholarship thing has got to be put in perspective. After all, Wasn't Bill Rowe a Rhodes Scholar?

 

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home