"We can't allow things that are inaccurate to stand." — The Word of Our Dan, February 19, 2008.

Sunday, June 17, 2012

How did Paul Lane access this information?

From the Twitters this morning:

@drewfoundland @stephenkent have any of you been able to provide an actual definition or example of what constitutes 'frivolous or vexatious' yet, or...?

@PaulLaneNL @drewfoundland. Mitchelmore asked for same info 14 times

@mark_watton @PaulLaneNL how would you know that? Are Access requests passed around the caucus table?

Labels: , ,


At 4:05 PM, June 17, 2012 , Blogger Edward Hollett said...

He obtained it illegally, just as did all the other Tories who received briefings that (apparently) contained details of Access requests from specific individuals.

At 4:18 PM, June 17, 2012 , Blogger WJM said...

I sher hope the OCIO will launch an immediate investgation.


Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home